<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
               xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
               xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
               xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
               xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
               xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
               xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
            <channel>
                <title>
					                		Regarding the probably flexural strength of C5 - Technical Issues                                    </title>
                <link>https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5</link>
                <description>SESOC Discussion Board</description>
                <language>en-US</language>
                <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 04:28:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
                <generator>wpForo</generator>
                <ttl>60</ttl>
                					                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Regarding the probably flexural strength of C5</title>
                        <link>https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-218</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 08:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[@brooke yes Nick, figure 5.16.  which means there will be a chance to  lead to 20% + or -  in %NBS?.     while you are here Nick I might ask one more thing regarding C2 table.C2A.1. is the c...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brooke yes Nick, figure 5.16.  which means there will be a chance to  lead to 20% + or -  in %NBS?.     while you are here Nick I might ask one more thing regarding C2 table.C2A.1. is the column sway Vb formula correct? is it suppose to be Hi ( story Hight of the soft story) instead of Heff?  Thank you </p>]]></content:encoded>
                        <category domain="https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues">Technical Issues</category>                        <dc:creator>Nan Li</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-218</guid>
                    </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>RE: Regarding the probably flexural strength of C5</title>
                        <link>https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-217</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Are you referring to the drop of the &quot;actual relationship&quot; line compared to the &quot;assumed relationship&quot; in Figure 5.16 of C5-2025?
That decrease is generally not considered in assessments, t...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you referring to the drop of the "actual relationship" line compared to the "assumed relationship" in Figure 5.16 of C5-2025?</p>
<p>That decrease is generally not considered in assessments, though might be in some instances where non-linear analysis is used.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                        <category domain="https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues">Technical Issues</category>                        <dc:creator>Nic Brooke</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-217</guid>
                    </item>
                                        <item>
                        <title>Regarding the probably flexural strength of C5</title>
                        <link>https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-216</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[in 5.5.5.2.1. the Mprob is corresponding to the moment when the extreme concrete fibre reaches strain = 0.003.  Also, as per section C5.5.3.4.1  the bilinear approximation  rules  and C5.5.5...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in 5.5.5.2.1. the Mprob is corresponding to the moment when the extreme concrete fibre reaches strain = 0.003.  Also, as per section C5.5.3.4.1  the bilinear approximation  rules  and C5.5.5.3.4.3, the curvature cap rules. the moment at curvature cap can be 20% approx less than the moment at 0.003 due to losing the lever arm of steel and concrete as the result of the spalling concrete cover. I am just wondering how this 20% moment difference is considered in the C5 framework. Thank you  </p>]]></content:encoded>
                        <category domain="https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues">Technical Issues</category>                        <dc:creator>Nan Li</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.sesoc.org.nz/forum/technical-issues/regarding-the-probably-flexural-strength-of-c5#post-216</guid>
                    </item>
                                                </channel>
        </rss>
        